contestada

there have been a multitude of court cases surrounding the legality of frisks. which is the best explanation for the repeated visitation of the matter in the courts?

Respuesta :

In a landmark ruling known as Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it is legal for American police to "stop and frisk" someone they have a good basis to believe is carrying a weapon and committing a crime.

What took place in the case of Illinois v. Wardlow?

Wardlow's conviction was overturned by the Illinois Appellate Court because Officer Nolan lacked the justification required by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, for an investigative stop, and the pistol should have been suppressed (1968).

How does Kansas vs. Glover affect things?

What happened: In an 8-1 decision, the court overturned and remanded the Kansas Supreme Court's decision, holding that when an officer lacks information rebutting an inference that the vehicle's owner is operating the vehicle, an investigative traffic stop made after running a vehicle's license plate and discovering.

To learn more about Kansas Supreme Court's from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/28701457

#SPJ4