Nate is a recent graduate who states that he has interned at a major accounting firm so that his value as a candidate for employment increases. A start-up recruits Nate based on his stated credentials without verifying them. Two days into the job, Nate's team lead realizes that Nate does not know much of what he claimed to know during the interview. This scenario best exemplifies
a. adverse selection
b. corporate governance
c. moral hazard
d. shared value creation

Respuesta :

A, adverse selection, since he lied about what he knew about the job and was given a job that he didn’t know about. Hope this helps!